top of page
Search

Navigating Insurance Through Mega Group Practices: A Tale of Alma and Headway

In the ever-evolving landscape of mental health services, the emergence of mega group practices like Alma and Headway has reshaped the way clinicians manage their practices, file claims, and connect with clients. As a clinician navigating this terrain, my experiences with these platforms have been both insightful and transformative.


Alma: A Comprehensive Solution with a Monthly Investment


Alma, with its robust features and monthly subscription fee of $125, has proven to be an all-encompassing solution for my practice. The investment covers platform usage, community networking, Continuing Education Units (CEUs), resources, and access to a growing Electronic Health Record (EHR) platform. What sets Alma apart is its commitment to providing advertising through insurance partnerships, a feature that has translated into several direct client referrals throughout the year.


The seamless claim filing process is a standout feature, using NPI group practice ID numbers to handle claims on behalf of group members. Beyond the convenience, the financial benefits are notable. Alma pays more per claim, and I typically receive payments within a swift two-week turnaround. The platform also extends valuable assistance in recouping funds from insurance companies, saving me both time and money.


One of the key advantages of Alma is the freedom from the bureaucratic hassles of dealing with insurance companies directly. The $125 monthly fee becomes a strategic investment, allowing me to focus on delivering quality care while Alma takes care of the administrative intricacies.


Headway: Free to Join, with Caveats


Headway, on the other hand, takes a different approach. Free to join, the platform automatically signs up clinicians with insurance panels, offering a quick entry into the world of mega group practices. In my brief stint with Headway, spanning about a week, I received two referrals, showcasing the potential for client connections.


However, the limitations became apparent when it came to credentialing. Headway's inability to credential with Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) prompted me to reconsider. As the platform pays roughly $10 less per claim compared to Alma, I weighed the financial implications. In the end, I found myself better off sticking with Alma and pursuing an independent group contract with BCBS, ensuring a more comprehensive and financially viable solution.


Varying Referral Rates and Considerations


It's worth noting that the rate of referrals to clients on both platforms remains unknown, as it varies significantly depending on factors such as location, specialty, and individual circumstances. Clinicians should carefully evaluate their unique needs and priorities when choosing between Alma and Headway.


In conclusion, my journey with Alma and Headway has been a learning experience, highlighting the importance of aligning platform choices with individual practice goals. Alma's comprehensive approach and financial benefits have proven invaluable, while Headway's free entry may appeal to clinicians willing to navigate potential credentialing challenges. Ultimately, the choice between the two hinges on a clinician's specific needs, priorities, and the path they envision for their practice in the evolving landscape of mental health services.


11 views0 comments
bottom of page